Hòa thượng Thích Quảng Đức

Ok, so self-immolation has been going on for centuries, particularly in India. But for most of the western world, the first time we ever heard of this type of protest was when a buddhist monk in Vietnam sat down at a crossroads in Saigon on 11th June 1963, had 5 litres of gasolene poured over him and dropped a lit match into his lap. He did this in reaction to the Buddhist Crisis  and treatment by the ruling administration in South Vietnam, Ngo Dinh Diem being the president at the time. It was caught on film for the world to see:

I’m not posting this for shock value or for any political reason. I simply think it needs sharing. I think the world needs to see what true devotion and true belief means. Granted, I can’t believe Thích Quảng Đức did such a thing or why ANYONE would do such a thing, but it is amazing what people will do and the lengths they’ll go to for a cause they truly believe in.

I think the other amazing thing about this particular case is Thích Quảng Đức didn’t move or make one sound while he burned. He fell over after his death, but the whole time he sat in the lotus position and never moved a muscle.


This also got me to thinking of the student protests going on in London of late over the increase to university fees. The students have resorted to violence to try to get their message across. This, historically, has never been a useful tool in protesting or getting what you want. Generally speaking, it has the adverse effect. I wonder what Thích Quảng Đức would have made of these protesters and their methods. Probably agree that it was pointless and will achieve nothing, but I’m not sure how many people would agree that his way was better (although it could be argued he helped the coup take place)


5 thoughts on “Hòa thượng Thích Quảng Đức

  1. ben says:

    that video is a reaction of the event. The background never adds up with the picture. The gas can is out of location and none of the buildings look quite the same as the one shown.

    • Quite possibly. I’m not that observant nor that good with video editing to recognise the differences.

      To be honest, I think you’re kind of missing the point if you’re concentrating on the detail of the video. Whether the video has been recreated or not, the message is still the same. You could watch a recreation of 9/11 and it still have the same effect.

      Either that or my writing is soooooooo bad that you concentrated more on the video detail than what was I saying. But that’s cool, as long as you enjoyed it 🙂

    • Just re-watched the video and I think you’re right. It certainly looks slightly different in areas, but that doesn’t make much difference (if any) to the content of my post.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s